Review
Inspect representative pages, components and user flows with automated and manual checks.
Accessibility & Web Standards
Build interfaces more people can understand and use.
I review and improve website structure, interaction and markup using accessibility practices, semantic HTML and standards-aware validation.
What does an accessibility and web-standards review cover?
It examines whether page structure, content and interactions work predictably across keyboards, assistive technology, browsers and screen sizes.
- Semantic headings and landmark structure
- Keyboard navigation and visible focus
- Form labels, errors and instructions
- Image alternatives and content clarity
- Color contrast and interaction states
- Responsive zoom and text behavior
- HTML and CSS validation
- Prioritized remediation guidance
Primary references: W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2 and the W3C Markup Validation Service.
How are accessibility improvements handled?
Issues are documented in context, prioritized by impact and corrected where the website technology and project scope permit.
Prioritize
Separate blockers and recurring component issues from lower-impact refinements.
Validate
Implement or document fixes, retest changed behavior and record remaining limitations.
Common questions
Does validation guarantee accessibility?
No. Valid markup supports quality, but accessibility also requires manual review of interaction, content, keyboard use and user context.
Can an existing website be improved?
Yes. Reviews can focus on high-value templates and recurring components before wider remediation.
Do you provide legal certification?
No. This service provides technical review and implementation support, not legal advice or a compliance guarantee.
Need an accessibility and standards review?
Share the website URL, platform and the pages or user flows that matter most.
Start a conversation